Here is a straight up lesson on the Progressive Era and its music. You may work on these in class. The project has two due dates: a blog post analysis of a song/sheet music by Friday 1.June.2012; and the creative work is due Monday 4.June.2012.
1. Using the Interactive Timeline from Digital History scan the decades between 1870 and 1930. Look for clues about how industrialization first affected Americans. Note any unrest, environmental issues, injustice for workers and the rise of reform movements.
Keep the First Amendment in mind while you think about how we Americans express ourselves.
2. Examine all of these images of sheet music from the late 1800s and early 1900s. (They are in a couple formats; all are multi-paged.)
Out in the Snow: a drunkard's child
The Alcoholic Blues (some blues)
Can You Tame Wild Wimmen
The Argentines, the Portuguese and the Greeks
The Battle of the Sewing Machines
Tammany: a pale face pow wow
3. Choose one song to study in detail. Inspect its cover, lyrics, music, etc., and, by June 1, write a blog post including the following, in any order.
a. Describe any important, interesting or surprising details of the cover and sheet music. Look for anything unfamiliar, identifiable (names, geography), play the music if you can.
b. Reflect on the purpose(s) of the audiences and authors. Whom do you think the publishers intended to play the piece? Why?
c. Identify the reform movement touched by the song. If you wrote a song with a similar purpose for a similar audience/purpose today, how would it be different?
c. Ask at least four questions you have about these works that are not answered by the texts (the sheet music) themselves.
5. Read about the 1970 Kent State massacre. Listen to the Neil Young's Ohio written days after the massacre, performed by Crosby, Still, Nash and Young. (The comments demonstrate how heated this event remains today.)
6. Remind yourself about the Occupy Movement and its goals.
7. Write a song, at least one verse and a chorus, that speaks to either a Progressive Era reform or Occupy.
Cooperative blog by North Haven Community School's American Studies class
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Friday, May 11, 2012
MM Presentations
For full credit any student who missed the run-through Thursday should post his presentation as well as any critical notes here. Barring that, you can e-mail it to me or use Noteshare or Google Docs to post/share it.
If you want my input, post/share before Friday (today) at 8:30 p.m. The final draft is due in Monday's class. If your stuck and want ideas, google PowerPointless and watch any number of the (mostly) amusing youtube videos about what not to do in this format.
Once again, the whole class has not been available to arrange student critique for your drafts.
Consequently, I offer two choices:
1. You all have e-mail, pick someone and mail your presentation to him or her.
2. Send me an e-mail briefly describing why peer review has been a nearly unattainable goal in this class.
If you want my input, post/share before Friday (today) at 8:30 p.m. The final draft is due in Monday's class. If your stuck and want ideas, google PowerPointless and watch any number of the (mostly) amusing youtube videos about what not to do in this format.
Once again, the whole class has not been available to arrange student critique for your drafts.
Consequently, I offer two choices:
1. You all have e-mail, pick someone and mail your presentation to him or her.
2. Send me an e-mail briefly describing why peer review has been a nearly unattainable goal in this class.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
While You're With Kate:
You can work on your presentations.
For images visit this website and see if any sites the article recommends might suit your purposes. Sourcing and attribution are critical and Wikicommons presents a no-conflict opportunity to gain access to some amazing primary documents and images.
For images visit this website and see if any sites the article recommends might suit your purposes. Sourcing and attribution are critical and Wikicommons presents a no-conflict opportunity to gain access to some amazing primary documents and images.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Multi-Media Presentations
Leta: Dred Scott
Riley: Robert E. Lee
Craig:Robert B. Taney Seven Days Campaign
Magazine pitch (what you want to say generally with enough information to intrigue an editor, and why it needs saying) due Monday 7.May.2012.
We'll tweak a presentation rubric that day too.
Riley: Robert E. Lee
Craig:
Magazine pitch (what you want to say generally with enough information to intrigue an editor, and why it needs saying) due Monday 7.May.2012.
We'll tweak a presentation rubric that day too.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Dred Scott Questions for Comment Here or in Class
If history is divided into heroes and villains, Chief Justice Robert B. Taney must be considered a villain.
1. Why do I say this?
2. Can you find anything about him online that redeems him, even partially?
3. Using this link to learn about one of the famous dissenting opinions and say whether the author, Justice Benjamin Curtis could be described as a hero.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Project, Sullivan Ballou assignment reminder:
As we read more about the Civil War, keep your mind open for a person, battle, event,
or cultural representation that you would like to explore through a
paper and an alternative digital medium. What medium you choose may
depend on your topic.
While you search, take time to make yourself conversant in the lives and historic effects of two men, Dred Scott and Frederick Douglass. They are covered in your text and in many places online.
My goal is for you, during Wednesday's class, to explore these two men together, using notes you take between now and Wednesday afternoon, and arrive at one or more big question or observation about their places in our country's complexion.
Also, after you listen to the last ten minutes of the first Civil War episode, defend or challenge the filmmakers' use of Sullivan Ballou's letter in the closing minutes of their introduction.
Write this as a short essay, three to five paragraphs. Revise it at least once, edit it and put it in a Google Doc. Then share it with me by Friday, sooner is fine.
Here is a rubric that will cover this essay.
Three Paragraph Essay Rubric
1. The initial paragraph of the essay summarizes what the piece is about.
Exceeds: Demonstrates insight and outside connections, amplifying original assignment beyond original question
Meets: Covers topic clearly
Partially Meets: Does not describe the topic fully
2. The second paragraph gives the writer's clear opinion on the subject.
Exceeds: Opinion is clear and supported by evidence placed smoothly into the exposition
Meets: Opinion is clear and supported by connected evidence
Partially Meets: Has either opinion or evidence or neither
3. The third paragraph provides a conclusion and ties the essay together.
Exceeds: Demonstrates depth of analysis, research and/or new insight gained
Meets: Ties ideas and information together to demonstrate accurate examination of topic
Partially Meets: Information provided does not relate to earlier ideas, or conclusion only partially connects previous thoughts
4. The essay is clear and easy to read and is well researched/explained.
Exceeds: Fluent use of language adds to the reader’s understanding
Meets: Language used provides accurate and interesting information
Partially Meets: Language obscures meaning
5. The essay is free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
Exceeds: No errors
Meets: 1-2 errors
Partially Meets: Enough errors that the meaning is obscured
6. Word choice.
Exceeds: Word choice demonstrates deep understanding and appreciation of topic, including appropriately placed terms of art
Meets: Word choice offers clear understanding
Partially Meets: Word choice obscures meaning
7. Paragraph coherence and unity.
Exceeds: All paragraphs contain topic sentences and unified, coherent supporting sentences and all three paragraphs relate logically
Meets: All paragraphs contain topic sentences and supporting sentences and all three paragraphs relate to one another
Partially Meets: Paragraphs are disconnected from each other and sentences do not relate
While you search, take time to make yourself conversant in the lives and historic effects of two men, Dred Scott and Frederick Douglass. They are covered in your text and in many places online.
My goal is for you, during Wednesday's class, to explore these two men together, using notes you take between now and Wednesday afternoon, and arrive at one or more big question or observation about their places in our country's complexion.
Also, after you listen to the last ten minutes of the first Civil War episode, defend or challenge the filmmakers' use of Sullivan Ballou's letter in the closing minutes of their introduction.
Write this as a short essay, three to five paragraphs. Revise it at least once, edit it and put it in a Google Doc. Then share it with me by Friday, sooner is fine.
Here is a rubric that will cover this essay.
Three Paragraph Essay Rubric
1. The initial paragraph of the essay summarizes what the piece is about.
Exceeds: Demonstrates insight and outside connections, amplifying original assignment beyond original question
Meets: Covers topic clearly
Partially Meets: Does not describe the topic fully
2. The second paragraph gives the writer's clear opinion on the subject.
Exceeds: Opinion is clear and supported by evidence placed smoothly into the exposition
Meets: Opinion is clear and supported by connected evidence
Partially Meets: Has either opinion or evidence or neither
3. The third paragraph provides a conclusion and ties the essay together.
Exceeds: Demonstrates depth of analysis, research and/or new insight gained
Meets: Ties ideas and information together to demonstrate accurate examination of topic
Partially Meets: Information provided does not relate to earlier ideas, or conclusion only partially connects previous thoughts
4. The essay is clear and easy to read and is well researched/explained.
Exceeds: Fluent use of language adds to the reader’s understanding
Meets: Language used provides accurate and interesting information
Partially Meets: Language obscures meaning
5. The essay is free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
Exceeds: No errors
Meets: 1-2 errors
Partially Meets: Enough errors that the meaning is obscured
6. Word choice.
Exceeds: Word choice demonstrates deep understanding and appreciation of topic, including appropriately placed terms of art
Meets: Word choice offers clear understanding
Partially Meets: Word choice obscures meaning
7. Paragraph coherence and unity.
Exceeds: All paragraphs contain topic sentences and unified, coherent supporting sentences and all three paragraphs relate logically
Meets: All paragraphs contain topic sentences and supporting sentences and all three paragraphs relate to one another
Partially Meets: Paragraphs are disconnected from each other and sentences do not relate
Monday, April 23, 2012
Riley's Answers
1. Why did Wilmer McLain say the Civil War "began in his front yard and ended in [his] front parlor"?
Wilmer McLain owned a farm in Virginia. The first battle of the Civil War, Bull Run, took place on his property. McLain moved to a different property close to Appomattox Courthouse, also in Virginia. When Lee surrendered to Grant at the end of the war the official proceedings took place in McLain’s new living room.
2. What percentage of the male population died in the Civil War?
According to the Civil War documentary by Ken Burns 2% of the male population died off.
3. How did the friction between states rights and a federal government contribute to the start of the Civil War?
The states thought they had more power to make decisions and the Federal Government thought they should be more powerful. This became very apparent when the question of slavery was raised.
4. Discuss writer Shelby Foote's premise that the "Civil War defines us" as Americans.
Shelby Foote believed that our country was at a crossroads. Although the war was a horrible thing, it shaped us as a nation.
5. Discuss Thomas Jefferson's comment that to keep slavery in the U.S. was like "holding a wolf by the ears.."
Slavery had been an issue since the Revolutionary War. In the documentary it said slavery sat like a coiled snake under the benches of the Constitutional Convention. The Southern States depended on slavery as a workforce if they were to let slavery go the economy would fall.
6. If one in seven Americans were owned by another American and essentially no one in the northern states held slaves, discuss the complexion (literal and figurative) of the population in the South. How did slavery remain as part of the culture?
Slaves were more abundant in the South. This contributed to a different looking population compared to the Northern States where everyone was mostly white.
7. Who is Alexis de Toqueville? How did his 1830s era observations and books inform the non-slave owning world of what America was like?
Alexis de Toqueville was a French political writer. He informed the non slave owning Americans that there really wasn’t equality in America because black people and Native Americans were second class citizens.
8. Who was John Brown?
John Brown was a unsuccessful businessmen and an abolitionist. He worked in the underground railroad helping slaves escape. He got in trouble in Kansas where he is men murdered pro slavery settlers. He was caught by then Colonel Robert E. Lee at Harper’s Ferry Virginia. He was tried, convicted of murder and hanged. He became a martyr of the North according to the History Channel.
9. Who was William Lloyd Garrison?
William Lloyd Garrison was an abolitionist who ran a militant newspaper, The Liberator. He called for complete freedom for black people. He believed slavery was a sin and people who owned slaves were criminals.
10. Who was Elijah Lovejoy?
Elijah Lovejoy was born in Albion, Maine. He graduated from Colby and he studied to be a minister. He believed in the gradual abolition of slavery and published editorials in St. Louis Missouri. Mobs destroyed his printing press three times. He died defending freedom of speech when a mob tried to seize his printing press for the fourth time according to bookrags.com.
11. What is meant by "Bleeding Kansas"?
Bleeding Kansas describes the conflicts that took place while decisions were being made whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a free or slave state.
14. How did the presidential election of 1860 lay the groundwork for Civil War?
Lincoln was pro abolition and was not supported by the South. The vote was divided in the South and split the vote. When Lincoln became president the Southern states started seceding.
15. What state was the first to pass a secession bill? What significance does
this have today, if any?
The first state to pass a secession bill was South Carolina. The Civil War documentary by Ken Burns said the cotton gin made the processing of cotton faster and more slaves were needed. South Carolina was a big cotton state and had the most to lose if slavery was abolished. The Civil War basically ruined their economy. They are still one of the poorer less educated states.
As you listen, watch, and read...
about the Civil War, keep your mind open for a person, battle, event, or cultural representation that you would like to explore through a paper and an alternative digital medium. What medium you choose may depend on your topic.
While you search, take time to make yourself conversant in the lives and historic effects of two men, Dred Scott and Frederick Douglass. They are covered in your text and in many places online.
My goal is for you, during Wednesday's class, to explore these two men together, using notes you take between now and Wednesday afternoon, and arrive at one or more big question or observation about their places in our country's complexion.
Also, after you listen the last ten minutes of the first Civil War episode, defend or challenge the filmmakers' use of Sullivan Ballou's letter in the closing minutes of their introduction.
Write this as a short essay, three to five paragraphs. Revise it at least once, edit it and put it in a Google Doc. Then share it with me by Friday, sooner is fine.
While you search, take time to make yourself conversant in the lives and historic effects of two men, Dred Scott and Frederick Douglass. They are covered in your text and in many places online.
My goal is for you, during Wednesday's class, to explore these two men together, using notes you take between now and Wednesday afternoon, and arrive at one or more big question or observation about their places in our country's complexion.
Also, after you listen the last ten minutes of the first Civil War episode, defend or challenge the filmmakers' use of Sullivan Ballou's letter in the closing minutes of their introduction.
Write this as a short essay, three to five paragraphs. Revise it at least once, edit it and put it in a Google Doc. Then share it with me by Friday, sooner is fine.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Leta's Answers... [post #1]
1. Why did Wilmer McLain say the Civil War "began in his front yard and ended in [his] front parlor"?
The first major battle of the Civil War occurred on July 21, 1861 at McLean’s farm in Manasses, Virginia. This battle is known as Bull Run and at the time was the largest bloodiest battle in American history. In the spring of 1863 McLean wanted to move away from the war, so he and his family moved west of Richmond, Virginia. On April 9, 1865 the Civil War ended with Robert E. Lee surrendering to Ulysses S. Grant in McLean’s parlor.
2. What percentage of the male population died in the Civil War?
Over three million men fought in the Civil War and two precent of the male population, over 620,000, died in the war.
3. How did the friction between states rights and a federal government contribute to the start of the Civil War?
Each state had its own opinion on the legality of slavery. As states become more divided, the federal government’s becomes more difficult as the mediator between the states. It also brought into question the extent of the federal government’s power and whether the federal government or the states could decided whether to allow or abolish slavery.
4. Discuss writer Shelby Foote's premise that the "Civil War defines us" as Americans.
The Civil War decided the kind of a country the United States wanted to be on many levels, not just an equal or unequal country but also as a divided or unified country. The Civil War left some scars of slavery and prejudice that still exist today and it has effected and continues to effect political decisions.
5. Discuss Thomas Jefferson's comment that to keep slavery in the U.S. was like "holding a wolf by the ears.."
I agree with Craig on this one, and would add that if you let go of the wolf’s ears there is a risk that it might turn around and bite you.
7. Who is Alexis de Toqueville? How did his 1830s era observations and books inform the non-slave owning world of what America was like?
Alexis de Toqueville was a French aristocrat, political thinker, and historian. His book Democracy in America is his best known work. It includes his observations of America as it developed as a country during the Civil War. One point he makes is the contradiction between America’s nationalism and sectionalism. The United States presented itself as a unified country and wanted the complete country it began as, however within America great division and conflict between states transpired during the period of the Civil War.
8. Who was John Brown?
John Brown was an (in my opinion radical) abolitionist. He wanted complete abolition of slavery in America. He led that Pottawatomie Massacre, however he is most well known for his raid of Harpers Ferry in 1859. He was executed because of this raid and was seen as a martyr for slavery.
9. Who was William Lloyd Garrison?
William Lloyd Garrison was a prominent abolitionist and journalist. He wanted slavery entirely eliminated in the United States. Garrison was one of the founders of the American Anti-Slavery Society, however he is most well know for his newspaper, The Liberator.
10. Who was Elijah Lovejoy?
Elijah Parish Lovejoy was born in Albion, Maine and attended Waterville College (now Colby College). After he moved to St. Louis, Missouri he promoted the abolition of slavery in a newspaper he started, the St. Louis Observer. He was also an active member of the American Anti-Slavery Society. Lovejoy received abuse from many pro-slavery groups and eventually they murdered Lovejoy. “Elijah Parish Lovejoy was America’s first martyr to freedom of the press.”
11. What is meant by "Bleeding Kansas"?
“Bleeding Kansas” refers to the period in Kansas after the Kansas-Nebraska act passed. The Kansas-Nebraska act ruled that the decision to make Kansas and Nebraska would be left up to the people living there, also known as “popular sovereignty.” This caused Northerns and Southerners to race to Kansas to claim the area and take it over as a free or slave state which led to high tension in the area and then resulted in violence.
13. Who was Hannibal Hamlin?
Hannibal Hamlin was President Lincoln’s Vice President during the Civil War. Interestingly, before his vice presidency he was the 26th Governor of Maine.
14. How did the presidential election of 1860 lay the groundwork for Civil War?
When Abraham Lincoln was elected as president in 1860 South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana seceded from the Union, wrote a new constitution and created the Confederate States of America. These secessions directly impacted the Civil War’s commencement. The text also mentioned that Abraham Lincoln did not hate the South, and in fact was married to a Southern. He was against slavery, however one of his main goals was to bring the states together as one country. His election in 1860 prompted the beginning stages of uniting the states.
15. What state was the first to pass a secession bill? What significance does this have today, if any?
South Carolina was the first to pass the secession bill. As the leader of the movement towards the Confederate States of America it played a large role in the start of the Civil War. I am not sure if that has any implications today in South Carolina, perhaps it is a more conservative state?
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
For You Devoted Students of the Civil War:
First, aspiring to be a student of history demonstrates scholarship and an appreciation of human nature in the face of all manner of misery, so congratulations.
Second, we are a disparate little group. Today, for instance, apparently only one of you will attend class.
Third, thank the cosmos for the Internet.
Here are questions from Ken Burns' Civil War for you to discuss/answer/elaborate on in the comments:
Those in bold type are mandatory to meet expectations for this assignment. Keep in mind, those who answer first have some advantage in that their observations might be more general, though they must be correct and point in a useful direction for further discussion. Posing another question within your comment is always good, even if it feels a little contrived. The deadline for at least three contributions is this Friday, 13.April.2012. To meet expectations, begin or continue at least seven more discussions by the Monday after vacation. Feel free to get all 10 out of the way this week. Though every comment counts, do your best to write and think generously in each one.
Use your memory, the oracle Google (and a good resource), or your text for information. Use good organization, provide sources (even if you simply say, According to...), vary your sentence beginnings. Attempt to write as if a prospective boss were reading your comments.
1. Why did Wilmer McLain say the Civil War "began in his front yard and ended in [his] front parlor"?
2. What percentage of the male population died in the Civil War?
3. How did the friction between states rights and a federal government contribute to the start of the Civil War?
4. Discuss writer Shelby Foote's premise that the "Civil War defines us" as Americans.
5. Discuss Thomas Jefferson's comment that to keep slavery in the U.S. was like "holding a wolf by the ears.."
6. If one in seven Americans were owned by another American and essentially no one in the northern states held slaves, discuss the complexion (literal and figurative) of the population in the South. How did slavery remain as part of the culture?
7. Who is Alexis de Toqueville? How did his 1830s era observations and books inform the non-slave owning world of what America was like?
8. Who was John Brown?
9. Who was William Lloyd Garrison?
10. Who was Elijah Lovejoy?
11. What is meant by "Bleeding Kansas"?
12. How did Southern Militias play a part in the rise of the Confederacy?
13. Who was Hannibal Hamlin?
14. How did the presidential election of 1860 lay the groundwork for Civil War?
15. What state was the first to pass a secession bill? What significance does this have today, if any?
Second, we are a disparate little group. Today, for instance, apparently only one of you will attend class.
Third, thank the cosmos for the Internet.
Here are questions from Ken Burns' Civil War for you to discuss/answer/elaborate on in the comments:
Those in bold type are mandatory to meet expectations for this assignment. Keep in mind, those who answer first have some advantage in that their observations might be more general, though they must be correct and point in a useful direction for further discussion. Posing another question within your comment is always good, even if it feels a little contrived. The deadline for at least three contributions is this Friday, 13.April.2012. To meet expectations, begin or continue at least seven more discussions by the Monday after vacation. Feel free to get all 10 out of the way this week. Though every comment counts, do your best to write and think generously in each one.
Use your memory, the oracle Google (and a good resource), or your text for information. Use good organization, provide sources (even if you simply say, According to...), vary your sentence beginnings. Attempt to write as if a prospective boss were reading your comments.
1. Why did Wilmer McLain say the Civil War "began in his front yard and ended in [his] front parlor"?
2. What percentage of the male population died in the Civil War?
3. How did the friction between states rights and a federal government contribute to the start of the Civil War?
4. Discuss writer Shelby Foote's premise that the "Civil War defines us" as Americans.
5. Discuss Thomas Jefferson's comment that to keep slavery in the U.S. was like "holding a wolf by the ears.."
6. If one in seven Americans were owned by another American and essentially no one in the northern states held slaves, discuss the complexion (literal and figurative) of the population in the South. How did slavery remain as part of the culture?
7. Who is Alexis de Toqueville? How did his 1830s era observations and books inform the non-slave owning world of what America was like?
8. Who was John Brown?
9. Who was William Lloyd Garrison?
10. Who was Elijah Lovejoy?
11. What is meant by "Bleeding Kansas"?
12. How did Southern Militias play a part in the rise of the Confederacy?
13. Who was Hannibal Hamlin?
14. How did the presidential election of 1860 lay the groundwork for Civil War?
15. What state was the first to pass a secession bill? What significance does this have today, if any?
Friday, April 6, 2012
On through Chapter 12
The weekend and Monday's work includes reading and blogging. Please attach any notes or notable topics as comments here.
Also, Leta and Riley should demonstrate good bloggy protocol. Please check the notes Craig has posted and add or discuss any aspect. Craig, you can comment on the comments.
Also, Leta and Riley should demonstrate good bloggy protocol. Please check the notes Craig has posted and add or discuss any aspect. Craig, you can comment on the comments.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
More Ch.11 notes.
Mason Dixon Line: Northeastern border of slave states (Pensilvania/Maryland) (Ohio River)
Underground Railroad: used to bring slaves from southern states to northern states.
Ohio: back and forth between whether or not someone could be processed for hiding slaves.
Manifest Destiny: God-blessed choice of own destiny.
City on a Hill: Beacon of all other cultures: THE BEST.
Underground Railroad: used to bring slaves from southern states to northern states.
Ohio: back and forth between whether or not someone could be processed for hiding slaves.
Manifest Destiny: God-blessed choice of own destiny.
City on a Hill: Beacon of all other cultures: THE BEST.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Burning up the chapters...
That is my optimistic titling of what we did today. Craig took great notes while I read Section 1 from Chapter 11. We discussed headings and major topics and used the review section to make sure the notes included important bits.
I was going to have Craig send the notes to me, but I am going to contact him and ask that he post them here, either in a separate post or comment.
Wednesday, you will finish the poster and assess our reading. Ken Burns' Civil War is on deck.
I was going to have Craig send the notes to me, but I am going to contact him and ask that he post them here, either in a separate post or comment.
Wednesday, you will finish the poster and assess our reading. Ken Burns' Civil War is on deck.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Tall Order
Nice work on the poster, today. It's inspiring already. By June, we'll all be headed out on a road trip West, thanks to you.
As for my tall reading order, my admittedly possibly unrealistic goal would have us reading 630-ish pages in about 60 days. That's 10-plus per day, or about half as fast as of my most recent grad school schedule. If we're to approximate this goal we will have to be serious and smart about our time in and out of class.
For the short term, let's make a commitment to get through Chapter 12, right up to the brink of the Civil War, by Tuesday, 70-ish pages. I think you understand how pared down this gigantic textbook is, so I'm loathe to leave out any more than we absolutely must, and since today's America still reflects the repercussions of decisions made in these crucial years surrounding the Civil War, I am eager for you to digest well this particular part. We will write in class, so you can read and take notes at home.
So, Chapter 10 for tomorrow, and, of course, if you have time keep going. No need to answer the questions at the end of each section. Look at them before you read, though. Please take at least three notes per chapter about the most interesting period, event, fact, person or something else. If you want to put them on an electronic doc that would be great--or the blog, for that matter.
As for my tall reading order, my admittedly possibly unrealistic goal would have us reading 630-ish pages in about 60 days. That's 10-plus per day, or about half as fast as of my most recent grad school schedule. If we're to approximate this goal we will have to be serious and smart about our time in and out of class.
For the short term, let's make a commitment to get through Chapter 12, right up to the brink of the Civil War, by Tuesday, 70-ish pages. I think you understand how pared down this gigantic textbook is, so I'm loathe to leave out any more than we absolutely must, and since today's America still reflects the repercussions of decisions made in these crucial years surrounding the Civil War, I am eager for you to digest well this particular part. We will write in class, so you can read and take notes at home.
So, Chapter 10 for tomorrow, and, of course, if you have time keep going. No need to answer the questions at the end of each section. Look at them before you read, though. Please take at least three notes per chapter about the most interesting period, event, fact, person or something else. If you want to put them on an electronic doc that would be great--or the blog, for that matter.
Western Trails Poster
Since I'm using a rubric that I couldn't quickly edit, I'll make the changes here:
All able to be seen from three feet away.
Required Elements
Key
Labels
Trails
Forts
Cities
Important geographic features, mountain ranges, rivers
Boundaries
Monday, March 26, 2012
Lessons from the Donner Party
You perhaps have thought of a few aphorisms to suit the lessons taught by the Donner Party's experience.
1. Write any you thought of in the comments section below. Give an example of who and how they went wrong. Or argue a point of your own using the events as your evidence.
The documentary we just watched opens with this paragraph from a French observer of American habits in the 1830s:
1. Write any you thought of in the comments section below. Give an example of who and how they went wrong. Or argue a point of your own using the events as your evidence.
The documentary we just watched opens with this paragraph from a French observer of American habits in the 1830s:
Alexis de Tocqueville (Actor, voice-over): It is odd to watch with what feverish ardor Americans pursue prosperity. Ever tormented by the shadowy suspicion that they may not have chosen the shortest route to get it. They cleave to the things of this world as if assured that they will never die, and yet rush to snatch any that comes within their reach as if they expected to stop living before they had relished them. Death steps in, in the end, and stops them before they have grown tired of this futile pursuit of that complete felicity which always escapes them.
How would you boil his sentiments down to a few words? What aphorisms suit his observations?
2. How would they differ or align with those you wrote after seeing the documentary?
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Westward...
Religion and money again combine to move the country west, often with dramatic results, as it with Mr. Lovejoy. The travails of Donner Party are an object lesson in wanderlust and hubris. While we prepare to watch the documentary about the Donner Party, please keep these questions in mind:
1. What reasons led James Reed and George Donner to take Hastings’ Cutoff? Why was their decision unwise?
2. What other factors contributed to the failure of their venture?
3. Was Lansford Hastings to blame for what happened to the Donner Party? How?
4. What traits did members of the Donner and Reed families possess? Support your answer with examples from the film.
5. How did people in the 1840s view the American West? How did the story of the Donner Party help to strike down the myth of frontier idealism?
1. What reasons led James Reed and George Donner to take Hastings’ Cutoff? Why was their decision unwise?
2. What other factors contributed to the failure of their venture?
3. Was Lansford Hastings to blame for what happened to the Donner Party? How?
4. What traits did members of the Donner and Reed families possess? Support your answer with examples from the film.
5. How did people in the 1840s view the American West? How did the story of the Donner Party help to strike down the myth of frontier idealism?
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Elijah Lovejoy
Read this short piece on Lovejoy. Find at least two other sources with additional information and post their links in the comments. Say who is the next "catalyst" character in the progress toward Civil War?
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Andrew Jackson according to Zinn and Boorstin
For this assignment, you'll need to be familiar with "As Long as the Grass..." by Zinn, and chapter 9, pages 224-245 in your text. We will work and talk about it in class Wednesday.
Because both Zinn and Boorstin thought deeply and broadly about their subject, both historians present Jackson more complexity than the usual golden halo seen in many textbooks.
In a post in the comments compare and contrast how Jackson is portrayed in each text. Is there anything you suspect is missing from both accounts? What else would you like to know?
Also, compare the wishes of Americans who want to feel comfortable "having a beer" with the president have with the popularity of Andrew Jackson as described by Boorstin?
Who in the current GOP race for the presidential nomination do you think is vying for the "having a beer" vote most successfully?
Because both Zinn and Boorstin thought deeply and broadly about their subject, both historians present Jackson more complexity than the usual golden halo seen in many textbooks.
In a post in the comments compare and contrast how Jackson is portrayed in each text. Is there anything you suspect is missing from both accounts? What else would you like to know?
Also, compare the wishes of Americans who want to feel comfortable "having a beer" with the president have with the popularity of Andrew Jackson as described by Boorstin?
Who in the current GOP race for the presidential nomination do you think is vying for the "having a beer" vote most successfully?
Ron Paul |
Rick Santorum |
Mitt Romney |
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Peoples History Discussion Questions
Be prepared to locate and discuss the answers to these questions from 'As Long As Grass Grows...' from APH of US
1. Why did almost every important Indian nation fight on the side of the British during the American Revolutionary War?
2. What was Jefferson’s policy toward the Indians?
3. What prompted Tecumseh’s rebellion?
4. How was the Battle of Horseshoe Bend won?
5. Why would demanding that Indians own private property make them more vulnerable to losing their land than if they continued to use the land in common?
6. What reasons did Jackson give to explain his invasion of Spanish-owned Florida? What resulted from the Seminole War of 1818?
7. How did President Jackson’s Indian policy compare (in practice, rationale, and effect) to his predecessors’?
8. How did Jackson act unconstitutionally?
9. What caused the outbreak of the Second Creek War?
10. How did Speckled Snake describe the history of European-Indian relations? Do you agree with his synopsis? If not, how would you alter it?
11. If you went up to a Creek or Cherokee in the 1830s and asked if you could buy some of his or her land, what would he or she say to you?
[Extra Credit : respond in a three to four paragraph comment. Remember to link to outside sources. Also see 'Persons of Mean and Vile Condition' in APH of US.] 12. Is there any parallel between Bacon’s Rebellion and the Indian Wars preceding the War of 1812 with respect to the dynamics among Indians, poor whites, and rich whites? If so, explain how the situations are parallel. If not, what factors are different enough so that there is no structural parallel?
13. What strategy(ies) did the Cherokees adopt to fight removal?
14. What position did Senator Frelinghuysen take regarding Indian removal? What action did Ralph Waldo Emerson take to oppose the removal of the Cherokees? Does the existence of ineffective white opposition to Indian removal indicate that white Americans were swept away by historical forces? Why or why not?
15. What happened to the Choctaws after they signed their treaty of removal? Were the terms of the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek observed by both sides?
16. Why did the Georgia militia arrest Sam Worcester and Elizar Butler? Were the actions of the militia consistent with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the U.S. Constitution? Why did it not matter whether the Supreme Court ruled in favor of or against the Cherokees?
17. By 1832, how long had the Creeks been defending their lands against the Europeans?
18. Place the following events in the order in which they usually happened:
a. Indians appeal to federal government to enforce treaty that protected the integrity of Indian land.
b. White settlers encroach on/invade Indian land.
c. Federal government does nothing.
d. On Indian land (by federal treaty) whites and Indians attack each other.
e. Federal government orders Indians to move farther west.
f. [Are any steps missing?]
Why did this process repeat itself over and over again?
19. What were the conditions under which the Creeks moved west?
20. How did the Seminoles resist removal? How effective was the Seminole form of resistance?
21. If the Cherokee removal was so dreadful that it was to be known as the Trail of Tears, why did Van Buren feel that it had the “happiest effects?”
22. Draw a map that includes the following: Appalachians, Mississippi River, Rocky Mountains, Florida Territory, Tallapoosa River in Alabama, the state borders of Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama, the location of the Battle of Horshoe Bend, the Trail of Tears.
23. Debate Resolution: Andrew Jackson’s Indian policy represented a fundamental change from the Indian policies of previous U.S. presidents.
Zinn, Howard (2011-04-10). A People's History of the United States: Abridged Teaching Edition (Kindle Locations 2264-2276). Kindle Edition.
1. Why did almost every important Indian nation fight on the side of the British during the American Revolutionary War?
2. What was Jefferson’s policy toward the Indians?
3. What prompted Tecumseh’s rebellion?
4. How was the Battle of Horseshoe Bend won?
5. Why would demanding that Indians own private property make them more vulnerable to losing their land than if they continued to use the land in common?
6. What reasons did Jackson give to explain his invasion of Spanish-owned Florida? What resulted from the Seminole War of 1818?
7. How did President Jackson’s Indian policy compare (in practice, rationale, and effect) to his predecessors’?
8. How did Jackson act unconstitutionally?
9. What caused the outbreak of the Second Creek War?
10. How did Speckled Snake describe the history of European-Indian relations? Do you agree with his synopsis? If not, how would you alter it?
11. If you went up to a Creek or Cherokee in the 1830s and asked if you could buy some of his or her land, what would he or she say to you?
[Extra Credit : respond in a three to four paragraph comment. Remember to link to outside sources. Also see 'Persons of Mean and Vile Condition' in APH of US.] 12. Is there any parallel between Bacon’s Rebellion and the Indian Wars preceding the War of 1812 with respect to the dynamics among Indians, poor whites, and rich whites? If so, explain how the situations are parallel. If not, what factors are different enough so that there is no structural parallel?
13. What strategy(ies) did the Cherokees adopt to fight removal?
14. What position did Senator Frelinghuysen take regarding Indian removal? What action did Ralph Waldo Emerson take to oppose the removal of the Cherokees? Does the existence of ineffective white opposition to Indian removal indicate that white Americans were swept away by historical forces? Why or why not?
15. What happened to the Choctaws after they signed their treaty of removal? Were the terms of the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek observed by both sides?
16. Why did the Georgia militia arrest Sam Worcester and Elizar Butler? Were the actions of the militia consistent with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the U.S. Constitution? Why did it not matter whether the Supreme Court ruled in favor of or against the Cherokees?
17. By 1832, how long had the Creeks been defending their lands against the Europeans?
18. Place the following events in the order in which they usually happened:
a. Indians appeal to federal government to enforce treaty that protected the integrity of Indian land.
b. White settlers encroach on/invade Indian land.
c. Federal government does nothing.
d. On Indian land (by federal treaty) whites and Indians attack each other.
e. Federal government orders Indians to move farther west.
f. [Are any steps missing?]
Why did this process repeat itself over and over again?
19. What were the conditions under which the Creeks moved west?
20. How did the Seminoles resist removal? How effective was the Seminole form of resistance?
21. If the Cherokee removal was so dreadful that it was to be known as the Trail of Tears, why did Van Buren feel that it had the “happiest effects?”
22. Draw a map that includes the following: Appalachians, Mississippi River, Rocky Mountains, Florida Territory, Tallapoosa River in Alabama, the state borders of Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama, the location of the Battle of Horshoe Bend, the Trail of Tears.
23. Debate Resolution: Andrew Jackson’s Indian policy represented a fundamental change from the Indian policies of previous U.S. presidents.
Zinn, Howard (2011-04-10). A People's History of the United States: Abridged Teaching Edition (Kindle Locations 2264-2276). Kindle Edition.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Women and the Workforce
Currently, men and women share the workforce equally. However, on average men are paid more than women for doing the same job. Despite this, women have come a long way from decades past when they were confined to the house and made a quarter to a half of what men made doing the same job. It is encouraging for women, this upward trend, and it should continue especially as labor intensive jobs become less in demand and there is more demand for organizational and office-based work. Also because more women than men attend college and receive degrees, women will be more qualified for those jobs. It will take years for this shift to happen, as women move through college and grow older move up the job ladder. However, I predict that eventually women will surpass men in the workforce and on average hold more jobs and make more money.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
For tomorrow...
read page 111 through the end of the chapter in "A Peoples History of the United States," a chapter about the other half of the population.
Leta will make three multiple choice questions and answers for the first third of the assignment; Riley will make three questions and answers from the middle third; and I will write three questions for the last section.
Submit them to me in writing or via Google Docs by class time tomorrow, please.
Leta will make three multiple choice questions and answers for the first third of the assignment; Riley will make three questions and answers from the middle third; and I will write three questions for the last section.
Submit them to me in writing or via Google Docs by class time tomorrow, please.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Linsanity breaks Asian stereotypes
Can Asians play basketball? This is a very new topic wether Asians can play basketball. For a long time now basketball has been know as an African American sport. There has been only one well known NBA player, Yao Ming from China. Athletics is not one of the main stereotypes of Asian people.
Jeremy Lin is a point guard for the New York Knicks. Lin attended Harvard and graduated in 2010 with a degree in economics with a 3.1 grade point average. Lin lead Harvard to their best record of all time. In his senior year he averaged 16.4 points, 4.4 rebounds, 4.5 assists, 2.4 steals and 1.1 blocks. Lin finished his collegiate career with 1,450 points and set the record for most points at any Ivy League school.
Lin began his NBA career as unrestricted free agent and signed with Golden State Warriors in 2010. This is interesting because the best of the best are picked by teams in the first and second rounds of the NBA draft. The rest of the players are unrestricted free agents, meaning if the player are willing, any team can sign them. Lin did not get much playing time for the Warriors. Before the 2011-2012 season Lin was claimed by the Rockets but was dropped the next day and picked up by the New York Knicks as a 3rd string point guard (meaning he would not be expecting much playing time). On February 4, 2012 Lin made his first start in his NBA career; he had 25 points, five rebounds, and seven assists (all career highs). Lin set the NBA record with 109 points in 4 starts. Lin pulled the Knicks out of a slump and got to prove his worth.
Before his first start Lin never had any recognition.
"Players playing that well don't usually come out of nowhere. It seems like they come out of nowhere, but if you can go back and take a look, his skill level was probably there from the beginning. It probably just went unnoticed."
—Kobe Bryant, after Lin scored 38 points on February 10, 2012
I agree with Kobe and I think this will start a movement to recognize Asian players. With Asians as athletic role models there is a chance that the stereotypes Asians have held may change.
Religion+Music
Ah yes, Religion and modern music, two forces that have been forever colliding. "The Music of the Devil", or Rock n' Roll, is the genre of music that is most commonly torn into. Even with the invention of Christian Rock, there are still people who believe that all Rock music is evil.
The jack-ass, I'm sorry, "author", responsible for the article I linked above, is one perfect example of religious intolerance towards Rock music. He says that even Christian Rock is Satan's music, since it is still Rock music, which as a whole is "evil". He says that the artists who perform Christian Rock aren't true christians. "The reason is simply because they are carnal and have no desire to obey the Word of God. They claim to want God, and to do His will; but, they only obey the Scriptures that are convenient for them." Oh, and that's not all. He uses this argument to also inject his views on Wicca, Abortion, and Gays, saying that they take the "truth of God, and twist it to fit their own purposes. "When we put all these things together, it becomes so OBVIOUS what Satan is trying to do. Can you imagine a Bible that teaches that it's ok to murder your baby, be a homosexuality, practice witchcraft, and listen to Devilish music? This is the exact type of crazy thinking the Devil's crowd wants us to accept. It won't happen! The carnal man desires to live in sin without any guilt. The only way to accomplish this is to REDEFINE the Truth of God's Word."
But, it's not only Rock n' Roll that's being attacked by religion, This guy decides to use Skrillex's song, Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites, winning a Grammy, as an excuse to attack someone and something that they are unfamiliar with and scared of. He says that Skrillex uses Satanic and Homosexual influences to win, saying that "As long as Skrillex wins Grammys and is accepted by mainstream media, he will claim souls for Satan and molest our children through his perverse philosophy of futuristic devil machine music." He also says that Skrillex's name translates from Latin into "Homosexual Satan Wasp". What. The actual. F#ck? I checked it out. Skrillex translates, both from English to Latin, and Latin to English, as Skrillex. He says that Dubstep was created to provide a "drop", which is somewhat true, but this guy says that a "drop" is a slang term for obtaining and doing drugs. WRONG. The drop in Dubstep is when a song goes from a more mellow tone, to a more aggressive, in your face beat with a lot more low-end power. Oh, and it STILL gets better! "In addition, the rhythm patterns he employs in his “music” are known to cause seizures to certain people, which provides ample opportunity for other concert-goers to rape said afflicted person(s)." AND "Over 100% of homosexual gays listen to, or have listened to Skrillex in their life — mostly while participating in door-to-door recruitment for sex orgies or attempting to molest children in one of the patented “Rape Vans” used by the gay homo community." Take a look at the link of the article, and look at the picture of Skrillex drinking coffee with an "X3" on the side (which I'm gonna guess stands for 3 shots of espresso), he has a caption under it that says "(Skrillex, shown here drinking “ecstasy”, in particular the potent “X3″ version)".
Now even though the Skrillex article is a satirical article, the saddest part is that there are people out there who actually do believe this sort of thing truly in their hearts, and believe that people like Skrillex are Satan-born terrorists, hell-bent on world domination, as proven by the first article I linked, which is not satirical.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the reason I am not a religious person.
The jack-ass, I'm sorry, "author", responsible for the article I linked above, is one perfect example of religious intolerance towards Rock music. He says that even Christian Rock is Satan's music, since it is still Rock music, which as a whole is "evil". He says that the artists who perform Christian Rock aren't true christians. "The reason is simply because they are carnal and have no desire to obey the Word of God. They claim to want God, and to do His will; but, they only obey the Scriptures that are convenient for them." Oh, and that's not all. He uses this argument to also inject his views on Wicca, Abortion, and Gays, saying that they take the "truth of God, and twist it to fit their own purposes. "When we put all these things together, it becomes so OBVIOUS what Satan is trying to do. Can you imagine a Bible that teaches that it's ok to murder your baby, be a homosexuality, practice witchcraft, and listen to Devilish music? This is the exact type of crazy thinking the Devil's crowd wants us to accept. It won't happen! The carnal man desires to live in sin without any guilt. The only way to accomplish this is to REDEFINE the Truth of God's Word."
But, it's not only Rock n' Roll that's being attacked by religion, This guy decides to use Skrillex's song, Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites, winning a Grammy, as an excuse to attack someone and something that they are unfamiliar with and scared of. He says that Skrillex uses Satanic and Homosexual influences to win, saying that "As long as Skrillex wins Grammys and is accepted by mainstream media, he will claim souls for Satan and molest our children through his perverse philosophy of futuristic devil machine music." He also says that Skrillex's name translates from Latin into "Homosexual Satan Wasp". What. The actual. F#ck? I checked it out. Skrillex translates, both from English to Latin, and Latin to English, as Skrillex. He says that Dubstep was created to provide a "drop", which is somewhat true, but this guy says that a "drop" is a slang term for obtaining and doing drugs. WRONG. The drop in Dubstep is when a song goes from a more mellow tone, to a more aggressive, in your face beat with a lot more low-end power. Oh, and it STILL gets better! "In addition, the rhythm patterns he employs in his “music” are known to cause seizures to certain people, which provides ample opportunity for other concert-goers to rape said afflicted person(s)." AND "Over 100% of homosexual gays listen to, or have listened to Skrillex in their life — mostly while participating in door-to-door recruitment for sex orgies or attempting to molest children in one of the patented “Rape Vans” used by the gay homo community." Take a look at the link of the article, and look at the picture of Skrillex drinking coffee with an "X3" on the side (which I'm gonna guess stands for 3 shots of espresso), he has a caption under it that says "(Skrillex, shown here drinking “ecstasy”, in particular the potent “X3″ version)".
Now even though the Skrillex article is a satirical article, the saddest part is that there are people out there who actually do believe this sort of thing truly in their hearts, and believe that people like Skrillex are Satan-born terrorists, hell-bent on world domination, as proven by the first article I linked, which is not satirical.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the reason I am not a religious person.
More or less how the Christians seem to operate on these matters
Prejudice Predictions
Write a blog post here that describes in detail you predictions regarding a specific prejudice in the U.S.
So far, Leta is going to comment on women's position. Is it in politics, Leta?
Craig is exploring religious objections to popular music.
Riley will write about the future of our stereotypes about Asians, in particular the phenomenon of Harvard's Jeremy Lin and his success on the New York Knicks team.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Craig's Questions
1. Why look beyond the Great Depression when trying to make sense of our current economic woes?
2. Where are these professors from?
•Michael Bernstein is a professor of History in Economics at Toulain U.
3. What are some of the differences between the 19th century panics and those in the 20th century?
•The 19th century panics were caused by things like bank failure due to agricultural reasons, like failed crops and the loans given out to families. 20th century crashes are caused by consumer welfare, meaning people lose their jobs, and they can't buy things as often as they used to, or for the same price, meaning companies who make said items must raise their prices to make ends meet.
4. Briefly explain the "business cycle."
•Patterns in the ebbs and flows of commerce you can trace quantitatively, lasting from a decade to a dozen years. They follow a periodic pattern: Businesses expand-->hire more workers--> produce more goods-->sell more goods---resource constraints (fuel, materials, labor costs)--> prices go up to make ends meet (the boom)--->"Peak"--> laying off workers---> less income for workers--> buy fewer things-->prices and wages lower, companies can again hire more workers and produce more goods--> (REPEAT)
5. Define hubris. What example does Great Depression expert Michael Bernstein provide?
•Being cocky. Bernstein says that the economists that said they had "tamed the business cycle" were being cocky and over confident about their work.
6. Name the years of five other Panics besides the Great Depression.
•1819, 1857, 1873, 1893,
7. Why do you think no one has ever paid reparation to those who have lost money in these meltdowns even though laws were broken?
•Because people are greedy.
8. Who made up the Progressive Party?
•Theodore Roosevelt
9. When did they form and what led to the formation?
•1912. They formed because Roosevelt wanted an "honestly elected" convention, one that wasn't controlled by his adversary in the presidential campaign.
2. Where are these professors from?
•Michael Bernstein is a professor of History in Economics at Toulain U.
3. What are some of the differences between the 19th century panics and those in the 20th century?
•The 19th century panics were caused by things like bank failure due to agricultural reasons, like failed crops and the loans given out to families. 20th century crashes are caused by consumer welfare, meaning people lose their jobs, and they can't buy things as often as they used to, or for the same price, meaning companies who make said items must raise their prices to make ends meet.
4. Briefly explain the "business cycle."
•Patterns in the ebbs and flows of commerce you can trace quantitatively, lasting from a decade to a dozen years. They follow a periodic pattern: Businesses expand-->hire more workers--> produce more goods-->sell more goods---resource constraints (fuel, materials, labor costs)--> prices go up to make ends meet (the boom)--->"Peak"--> laying off workers---> less income for workers--> buy fewer things-->prices and wages lower, companies can again hire more workers and produce more goods--> (REPEAT)
5. Define hubris. What example does Great Depression expert Michael Bernstein provide?
•Being cocky. Bernstein says that the economists that said they had "tamed the business cycle" were being cocky and over confident about their work.
6. Name the years of five other Panics besides the Great Depression.
•1819, 1857, 1873, 1893,
7. Why do you think no one has ever paid reparation to those who have lost money in these meltdowns even though laws were broken?
•Because people are greedy.
8. Who made up the Progressive Party?
•Theodore Roosevelt
9. When did they form and what led to the formation?
•1912. They formed because Roosevelt wanted an "honestly elected" convention, one that wasn't controlled by his adversary in the presidential campaign.
Unexpected Connections
In the Panic audio story, we learned about the connections between the Rothschild family's prudent investing before the 1873 Panic, 20th century resentment of Jews in general, and Nazi Germany.
How does that affect the way you think about prejudices Americans have today? In a link-riddled post, trace these prejudices' beginnings and/or predict their futures? You can include "positive" prejudices, too. Feel free to use images, biased information and straight up propaganda in this post. You're looking for extreme views rather than balance. Try to predict some of the logical (maybe illogical) ends, and suggest solutions for preventing any negative projections.
We may want to investigate the rise of fundamental Christianity as a possible connection to economic distress.
How does that affect the way you think about prejudices Americans have today? In a link-riddled post, trace these prejudices' beginnings and/or predict their futures? You can include "positive" prejudices, too. Feel free to use images, biased information and straight up propaganda in this post. You're looking for extreme views rather than balance. Try to predict some of the logical (maybe illogical) ends, and suggest solutions for preventing any negative projections.
We may want to investigate the rise of fundamental Christianity as a possible connection to economic distress.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Leta's Inside Job Review
When a crisis happens the news is all over it, whether it’s the New York Times or CNN there are publications about what’s going on now. However, sometimes, how we got there is overlooked, the focus is so much in the present, that the path leading up to it is forgotten. This is why I appreciate the movie “Inside Job.” The film goes back to the beginning of the financial crisis of 2008 and walks the viewer through to the present. It allows the viewer to see each contributing aspect and why it effected the economy the way it did. There was a great deal of information and to truly understand the movie I would have to watch it maybe two or three more times. It moved quickly and there were definitely pieces that I missed or didn’t quite understand (although stopping the movie for discussion at some points was definitely helpful in that respect). The interview had a difficult job of talking to these high-up economists and CEOs, I felt uncomfortable at some points when he was asking questions that the interviewee couldn’t respond to or responded rudely. However, I know that this feeling is not necessarily a bad one, and shows me the corruption and covering up that goes on. Overall, it was an interesting film that covered complex concepts and one that I enjoyed and would watch again.
Leta's Panic Response
- Use the blog to answer or comment on these questions.
- Why look beyond the Great Depression when trying to make sense of our current economic woes?
Looking beyond the Great Depression is important because no “panic” has been exactly same, we cannot make complete sense of our economic woes by only looking at one crisis. The financial crisis we are experiencing now is not exactly like the Great Depression, or any other panic, however by piecing parts of each one together we might be able to better prepare ourselves for the future. In fact, Professor Scot Nelson believes that the panic of the 1870s is most similar to current financial crisis, not the Great Depression.2. Where are these professors from?Peter Onuf (18th century guy) is the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation Professor of History at the University of Virginia. Ed Ayers (19th century guy) is President of the University of Richmond. Brian Balogh (20th century guy) is a Professor of History at the University of Virginia. Michael Bernstein is a professor at Tulane University and Scott Nelson is a professor at William and Mary College.3. What are some of the differences between the 19th century panics and those in the 20th century?The 19th century panics were more related to bank failures related to collapses in agriculture, while 20th century panics are more related to consumer welfare and company failure.4. Briefly explain the "business cycle."The business cycle is a pattern in commerce that often lasts about a decade. When things are going well in the business cycle, companies are growing. However, as companies get bigger, more resources are required, and therefore costs rise. There is a peak where the company requires more than it can actually make and the cycle turns around. The more difficult part of the business cycle is when companies are downsizing. When companies cannot turn around at the bottom of the business cycle is when things go bad.5. Define hubris. What example does Great Depression expert Michael Bernstein provide?Hubris is basically excessive pride and over-confidence. Michael Bernstein uses this word describing economists when they think that the business cycle has been solved.6. Name the years of five other Panics besides the Great Depression.1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 18937. Why do you think no one has ever paid reparation to those who have lost money in these meltdowns even though laws were broken?No one has ever paid reparation to those who have lost money in these meltdowns because the people in control, who invented the system, and maybe the people with the true power to punish, are the ones committing the offenses. It is also difficult at times to distinguish between incompetence and fraud.8. Who made up the Progressive Party?The Progressive Party (also known as the Bull Moose Party) was founded by Theodore Roosevelt and was made up by people who had broken off of the Republican Party.9. When did they form and what led to the formation?The part was formed in 1912 after the split of President William Taft and President Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt was originally a Republican when he left office in 1909. He selected William Taft to succeed him, however he ended up not agreeing with Taft’s policies and then ran against him as a member of the Progressive Party.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Panic!: A History of Financial Crisis Riley's Response
1. Why look beyond the Great Depression when trying to make sense of our current economic woes?
The great depression was only one event in a series of ups in downs.
The great depression was only one event in a series of ups in downs.
2. Where are these professors from?
- Peter Onuf is the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation Professor of History at the University of Virginia.
- Ed Ayers is President of the University of Richmond.
- Brian Balogh is a Professor of History at the University of Virginia.
- Brian Balogh is a Professor of History at the University of Virginia.
3. What are some of the differences between the 19th century panics and those in the 20th century?
The panics in the 19th century were more about land. The panics in the 20th century were about stocks.
The panics in the 19th century were more about land. The panics in the 20th century were about stocks.
4. Briefly explain the "business cycle."
Business cycles or Trade cycles usually last from a decade or a dozen years. They usually follow a pattern where business start to expand and higher more people while producing more goods. Over time they start to have to pay more for raw materials and wages. At one point there is a peak where they have to cut back being the down cycle where unemployment happens. When the cycle hits the bottom the cycle starts again.
5. Define hubris. What example does Great Depression expert Michael Bernstein provide?
hu•bris |ˈ(h)yoōbris|
noun
excessive pride or self-confidence.
He comments on the economists of the 1960s taming the business.
6. Name the years of five other Panics besides the Great Depression.
1. The Panic of 1819
2. The Panic of 1837
3. The Panic of 1873
4. The Panic of 1901
5. The Panic of 1907
7. Why do you think no one has ever paid to those who have lost money in these meltdowns even though laws were broken?
It is a risky thing to invest because profits are not guaranteed. Many people say if you don't have it to loose you shouldn't invest it.
8. Who made up the Progressive Party?
The Progressive Party was formed after a spilt in the Republican Party.
9. When did they form and what led to the formation?
9. When did they form and what led to the formation?
The Progressive Party formed in 1912. Theodore Roosevelt left office in 1909 and selected William Howard Taft to succeed him. Roosevelt did not like what Taft was doing so he ran against him with the new Progressive Party.
War of 1812 in Maine
Listen to the podcast of an interview with David Hanna and read the prologue of his book "Knights of the Sea."
In your text, read pages pages 199-209, and 214-220, paying particular attention to Andrew Jackson's rise, New England's opposition to the war, and the growing controversy around slavery.
Also read from digital history's account of the Embargo of 1807 and the War of 1812.
In the comments:
What economic effects did the politics of Europe have on life in the United States? Reflect on whether the War of 1812 worth fighting.
What effect did the Missouri Compromise have on Maine?
In your text, read pages pages 199-209, and 214-220, paying particular attention to Andrew Jackson's rise, New England's opposition to the war, and the growing controversy around slavery.
Also read from digital history's account of the Embargo of 1807 and the War of 1812.
In the comments:
What economic effects did the politics of Europe have on life in the United States? Reflect on whether the War of 1812 worth fighting.
What effect did the Missouri Compromise have on Maine?
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Panic! A history of financial crisis
My turn to Panic! I thought I posted this right after class and just saw that I had not. We'll take some time to answer these in class if you've run out of time tonight.
Listen to the Panic podcast and either answer these questions or make up eight or more of your own and post them as a separate "New Post."
Use the blog to answer or comment on these questions.
1. Why look beyond the Great Depression when trying to make sense of our current economic woes?
2. Where are these professors from?
3. What are some of the differences between the 19th century panics and those in the 20th century?
4. Briefly explain the "business cycle."
5. Define hubris. What example does Great Depression expert Michael Bernstein provide?
6. Name the years of five other Panics besides the Great Depression.
7. Why do you think no one has ever paid reparation to those who have lost money in these meltdowns even though laws were broken?
8. Who made up the Progressive Party?
9. When did they form and what led to the formation?
Listen to the Panic podcast and either answer these questions or make up eight or more of your own and post them as a separate "New Post."
Use the blog to answer or comment on these questions.
1. Why look beyond the Great Depression when trying to make sense of our current economic woes?
2. Where are these professors from?
3. What are some of the differences between the 19th century panics and those in the 20th century?
4. Briefly explain the "business cycle."
5. Define hubris. What example does Great Depression expert Michael Bernstein provide?
6. Name the years of five other Panics besides the Great Depression.
7. Why do you think no one has ever paid reparation to those who have lost money in these meltdowns even though laws were broken?
8. Who made up the Progressive Party?
9. When did they form and what led to the formation?
South Park Margaritaville episode
The South Park episode Margaritavile is about the ridiculous state of the economy. Randy Marsh buys a margarita mixer machine on a payment plan. The plan is sold over and over again and his son Stan ends up trying to return it to the Treasury Department. Randy preaches to the town about austerity.
Here is Randy Marsh turning his back on consumerism.
Craig's Continental Breakup
1. What is currency?
•Currency is money. It's what is traded between merchants or between the people and merchants
2. What is the Euro?
•The Euro is the currency used across most of Europe.
3. As the modern move toward the Eurozone picked up speed, what did German negotiators want that they did not get?
•The German negotiators wanted to have a united government with all of Europe, instead of each country having it's own. They hoped that they would be able to keep inflation down that way.
4. Why does this matter?
•The Germans wanted to avoid inflation at all costs, as they believed the hyperinflation of 1920 is what allowed the Nazi's to take control of Germany, and that's the absolute last thing that the Germans want to repeat itself.
5. Who or what is PIMCO?
•PIMCO is one of the biggest bond fund managers in the world, and one of the biggest money loaners to governments across the world.
6. What is a bond?
•A bond is basically a loan. You lend someone, say $100, and you expect them to pay you back in full, with interest, in a certain amount of time.
7. What other country would be wounded economically if the Greek economy fails?
•Italy.
8. What is today’s unemployment rate in Spain?
•Over 20%
9. What will it take to “bail out” Greece?
•Have the European Central Bank print new euros that the countries in trouble can use to pay off their debts.
•Currency is money. It's what is traded between merchants or between the people and merchants
2. What is the Euro?
•The Euro is the currency used across most of Europe.
3. As the modern move toward the Eurozone picked up speed, what did German negotiators want that they did not get?
•The German negotiators wanted to have a united government with all of Europe, instead of each country having it's own. They hoped that they would be able to keep inflation down that way.
4. Why does this matter?
•The Germans wanted to avoid inflation at all costs, as they believed the hyperinflation of 1920 is what allowed the Nazi's to take control of Germany, and that's the absolute last thing that the Germans want to repeat itself.
5. Who or what is PIMCO?
•PIMCO is one of the biggest bond fund managers in the world, and one of the biggest money loaners to governments across the world.
6. What is a bond?
•A bond is basically a loan. You lend someone, say $100, and you expect them to pay you back in full, with interest, in a certain amount of time.
7. What other country would be wounded economically if the Greek economy fails?
•Italy.
8. What is today’s unemployment rate in Spain?
•Over 20%
9. What will it take to “bail out” Greece?
•Have the European Central Bank print new euros that the countries in trouble can use to pay off their debts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)